A fallacy which may be termed "the fallacy of the frozen abstraction" . . .
consists of substituting some one particular concrete for the wider abstract
class to which it belongs—[e.g.,] substituting a specific
ethics (altruism) for the wider abstraction of "ethics." Thus, a man may reject
the theory of altruism and assert that he has accepted a rational code—but,
failing to integrate his ideas, he continues unthinkingly to approach ethical
questions in terms established by altruism.
<div class="social_block">
<div class="gplus_wrapper"><div class="g-plusone" data-href="https://aynrandlexicon.com/ # site base urllexicon/frozen_abstraction,_fallacy_of/1.html" data-size="medium"></div></div>
<div class="fb-like" data-href="https://aynrandlexicon.com/ # site base urllexicon/frozen_abstraction,_fallacy_of/1.html" data-send="false" data-layout="button_count" data-height="20" data-width="90" data-show-faces="false"></div>
</div>