Falsehood

“True” and “false” are assessments within the field of human cognition: they designate a relationship [of] correspondence or contradiction between an idea and reality . . . . The false is established as false by reference to a body of evidence and within a context, and is pronounced false because it contradicts the evidence.

The Philosophy of Objectivism Leonard Peikoff, “The Philosophy of Objectivism
lecture series (1976), Lecture 6.

All falsehoods are self-contradictions.

When making a statement about an existent, one has, ultimately, only two alternatives: “X (which means X, the existent, including all its characteristics) is what it is”—or: “X is not what it is.” The choice between truth and falsehood is the choice between “tautology” (in the sense explained) and self-contradiction.

Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology Leonard Peikoff “The Analytic-Synthetic Dichotomy,”
Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, 136.

See also ANALYTIC-SYNTHETIC DICHOTOMY; ARBITRARY; CONTRADICTIONS; IDENTITY; TRUTH.

BUY THE BOOK Tell a friend
about this page
Home